Jun 28

THE LETTER TO THE HEBREWS [OR, TO US?]

The letter entitled, Hebrews, was written to Christians who had been converted from the Jewish religion. These Christians were beginning to cast their eyes back toward Judaism, and away from Christianity. After all, heavenly angels had a hand in revealing Judaism; the incomparable Moses was its mediator; legendary Joshua conquered their land of rest; and honorable Aaron initiated the high priesthood. Yes, Judaism was certainly tempting—especially since it had long been their way of life. To them, Christianity was new, uncomfortable, unglamorous.
However, their problem was: they had either never heard, or had never understood, or had forgotten what the letter of Hebrews was about to tell them. True, angels helped in revealing Judaism (2:2), but they were only servants whereas Jesus was the Son of God (1:5-14). Thus, as a revealer of religion, Christ is superior (1:4). So why go back?! (2:1) . Yes, Moses was the great mediator of Judaism, but he too was only a servant in the house of Jesus (3:5-6). Thus, as a mediator, Jesus is superior (3:3). So why go back?! (3:12). Yes, Joshua conquered and delivered unto them their promised land of rest, but even Joshua spoke of a greater rest (4:8) that came by Jesus (4:3). Thus, as a provider of rest, Jesus is superior. So why go back?! (4:11). Yes, Aaron and his descendants served as high priests, but Jesus is the high priest with a better priestly order (7:1-28), a more excellent ministry (8:1-13), a greater and perfect tabernacle (9:1- 28), and a much better sacrifice (10:1-18). Thus, as a high priest, Jesus is superior. So why go back?! (4:14). Yes, why go back to that which was vastly inferior?!!
It is easy for us, is it not, to shake our heads in bewilderment at these Christians for leaving the inexhaustible riches and blessings of Christ for the death-inducing, unforgiving, miserable way of their former life. Yet. Does God shake His head in bewilderment when we miss the point and become those “Hebrew-like Christians” of today? Do we, in like manner, cast our eyes back to a former way of life: the world? denominationalism? philosophies? Have we never heard, or have we never understood, or have we forgotten that Jesus and the life that He offers now on earth as well as in eternity is far, far superior than that which we previously had? So why? Why ever go back?!
Brethren, “let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering…we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul” (10:23,39).
Gary Henson

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/the-letter-to-the-hebrews-or-to-us/

Jun 20

ALL SPIRITUAL BLESSINGS ARE IN CHRIST

We are told: “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ” (Eph. 1:3). This means that every single benefit to one’s soul is obtained and realized by being in Christ. What, then, are these spiritual blessings?

Those who are in Christ are REDEEMED. The Bible teaches that it is Jesus “In whom we have redemption” (Eph. 1:7). “Redemption” means “a releasing for (i.e., on payment of) a ransom” (Vine’s, vol. 3, p. 264). Thus, the one who is in Christ has been released from sin and the clutches of Satan because Jesus paid the ransom price with the crucifixion.

Those who are in Christ have become a NEW CREATURE. “Therefore, if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature” (2 Cor. 5:17). To be a “new creature” is to be a new person (Eph. 4:25) and to have a new life (Rom. 6:4)–no matter how evil a life one had been living.

Those who are in Christ have no CONDEMNATION. “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 8:1). To be condemned is to be disapproved of God. It is to have His judgment pronounced against us. But, at Judgment Day, to those who are in Christ, there will be no condemnation.

Those who are in Christ have FORGIVENESS OF SINS. Colossians 1:14 reveals, “In whom we have forgiveness through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins.” “Forgive” literally means to send away. Thus, those who are in Christ have had their sins sent away from the mind of God–there is no sin on their record.

Those who are in Christ have SALVATION. The apostle Paul wanted others to “obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus” (2 Tim. 2:10). Awaiting each person is either God’s reward in heaven or God’s wrath in hell. Every human being is either saved from God’s wrath, or he is lost. The only way to be saved is to be in Christ.

HOW THEN DOES ONE GET IN CHRIST? Romans 6:3 and Galatians 3:27 both state that one is “baptized into Jesus Christ.” It is clear then, one gets in Christ by being baptized for the purpose of getting into Him. Thus, if you were told that you were in Christ before you were baptized (such as, at the moment you believed), and then were later baptized for some other reason, then you were never baptized for the purpose of getting into Christ, and these blessings (which all occur in the mind of God, not ours) have never been obtained. We would that all men be in Christ and enjoy these spiritual blessings, but it can be achieved only by the means by which God has decreed.
Gary Henson

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/all-spiritual-blessings-are-in-christ/

Jun 13

Helps for Interpreting the BIBLE

Since we are to “rightly divide the word of truth” (2 Tim. 2:15) to the extent that we do not teach nor practice error (Rev. 22:18-19), then we must correctly interpret the Bible. While there are many principles involved in proper interpretation, the following will certainly help.
FIRST: Who was the speaker? Was he inspired or not? The statement, “All that a man hath will he give for his life” occurs in the Bible (Job 2:4), but it is an inspired recording of the words of Satan. The statement was a falsehood. So determine who is speaking.
SECOND: Who was addressed? When God gave the Ten Commandments, He was giving them to those whom He brought out of the land of Egypt (Ex. 20:1-2)—not you or me (cf., Rom. 7:1-7). When Jesus promised the baptism of the Holy Spirit, He was speaking only to the apostles (Acts 1:1-5). To fail to consider who was addressed can easily lead to a serious misinterpretation.
THIRD: When was it spoken/written? Many people point to the thief on the cross as proof that one was saved without baptism. However, “Today shall thou be with me in paradise” was spoken before the Old Testament was replaced by the New (Heb. 9:16-17). Furthermore, while Jesus was still on earth, He had the power to forgive sins (Mark 2:10). So, consider when it was spoken.
FOURTH: Where was it spoken or written? To realize that the statements “I rejoice” and “I have all things” were written by Paul while he was in a Roman prison will make a deeper impression concerning true joy and true needs. So determine where it was spoken.
 
These four principles are small but significant considerations which help us to “rightly divide the word of truth.”
Gary Henson

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/helps-for-interpreting-the-bible/

Jun 06

A Plea For Christ

Our life as a Christian is a plea to the world on behalf of Jesus Christ. We do so by our words (Phil. 2:16; Mark 16:16) and our manner of life (Mat. 5:1; 1 Pet. 3:15; 2 Cor. 3:2-3). What, then, is it we are to plea?
When we plea for Christ to the world, we are pleading for His DEITY. The apostles made this the central fact of their proclamation (Acts 2:36; 5:42; 17:2-3; etc.). We, too, are to plea that Jesus was God. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God….and the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us” (John 1:1,14).
When we plea for Christ to the world, we are pleading for His WORD–THE BIBLE. We are to proclaim that the Bible is inspired by God: “All scripture is given by inspiration of God…” (2 Tim. 3:16). We are to proclaim that the Bible is all-sufficient (we do not need addition, man-made creed books): “According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain to life and godliness…” (2 Pet. 1:3).
When we plea for Christ to the world, we plea for His AUTHORITY. We must proclaim that any other religion or any philosophy of life has no authority nor validity, for: “All authority is given unto me, in heaven and on earth” (Mat. 28:18) and “There is no other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).
When we plea for Christ to the world, we plea for His NAME. A follower of Christ is a Christian–that’s all! God said He was going to name us (Isa. 62:2), and the name with which He named us is “Christian” (Acts 11:26; 26:28; 1 Pet. 4:16). We plea to the world that God did not name us with all the various names which are used today.
When we plea for Christ to the world, we plea for His CHURCH. We plea for unity (singularity) because Jesus “pray[ed] that they all be one” (John 17:20) and division is condemned (1 Cor. 1:10). Such unity can be achieved only by (1) rejecting the divisive creed books, and (2) following precisely what the Bible authorizes (John 8:32; Rev. 22:18-19).
May each Christian, by his words and by his manner of life, plea to the world on behalf of the Deity, the Word, the Authority, the Name and the church of Christ.
Gary Henson

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/a-plea-for-christ/

May 31

PRESENT DAY MIRACLES?

Of a truth, miracles were performed in the first century during the writing of the New Testament, but to claim that miracles are being performed today is to claim that which no longer occurs. God Himself told us there would come a time when miracles would cease–and He also told us when.
First Corinthians 13:8-13 gives us that information. Follow along with your Bible and with the chart as these verses are considered. Love never ends – – it continues on throughout eternity (:8). Miracles were to end (:8). Miracles were referred to as that which was in “part” (:9). Miracles (the partial) were to end when the perfect came (:10). The condition of immaturity (child; see darkly; know in part) will change to the condition of maturity (man; see clearly; know fully) when the perfect comes (:11-12). Faith abides (:13) but will end in sight when one is in heaven (2 Cor. 5:7; Heb. 11:1). Hope abides (:13) but will end when heaven is obtained (Rom. 8:24-25).
From this it is clear that miracles were to end when the perfect came. The crucial question is: What is the perfect? Could it be heaven or Christ when He comes the second time? No, because there is a time span between the arrival of the perfect and the second coming of Christ: the miracles were to cease, but faith and hope were to continue until heaven came; furthermore, Christians could become mature at a time before heaven (2 Tim. 3:16-17).
What, then, is the perfect? The perfect is the finalized and completed revelation of the 27 books of the New Testament. Romans 12:2 identifies it as the “perfect will of God,” and James 1:25 describes it as “the perfect law of liberty.”
Thus, miracles existed at the beginning of the church for the purpose of proving that God was speaking through the men (Mark 16:17-20; John 3:2; 1 Kings 18:36-39), and were to end when the revealing of God’s Will had been completed (the NT) which would enable man to become mature (v:11-12; 2 Tim. 3:16-17).


Miracles? Not today!
Gary Henson

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/present-day-miracles-2/

May 24

Agape

“1. Affection, good-will, love, benevolence” is the definition given by Thayer to the Greek word agape. The Scriptures describe it as actions of benevolence or esteem due to one’s intense desire for the well-being of another (John 3:16; 1 John 3:16-19; 4:9-11). It is not merely saying “I love you.” Rather, it is love manifested in actions. It is not merely friendship (phileo). It is not family love (storgos). It is not a physical attraction love (eros). But it is the highest form of love—the willing sacrifice of self on behalf of others.

It is the agape love with which a Christian is to love God. Upon being asked “Which is the greatest commandment?” Jesus answered, “Thou shalt love [agape] the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy mind, and with all thy strength” (Mark 12:30). Yes, the Christian must love God with all his: (1)”thoughts, passions, desires, appetites, affections, purposes, endeavors;” (2) life; (3) intellect; and (4) energy. To truly agape God is to willingly keep His commandments, and honestly proclaim “I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me” (Gal. 2:20).
It is the agape love with which a Christian is to love his neighbor. Jesus said the second great commandment is, “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself” (Mat. 22:39). Who is my neighbor? He is anyone who is near by: at work or school; at stores; in traffic. The Christian loves his neighbor as he loves himself: physically, emotionally, socially and spiritually. Yes, you should do unto them what when you would want them to do for you if the circumstances were reversed.
It is the agape love with which a Christian is to love his enemy. “But I say unto you, love your enemies” (Mat. 5:44-48). It may seem unthinkable and impossible, but Jesus gave us the example by doing that very thing. We are to love our enemies by forgiving them. Jesus did. So did Stephen. We can too. We are to love our enemies by doing them good. If we do them good, we may overcome evil with good and win him to Christ –as God did with us. Yes, it is important to love our enemies.
It is the agape love with which a Christian is to love his brethren. “A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another” (John 13:34-35). We are to love one another without suspicions (as the eleven may have been so inclined due to the betrayal by Judas), by strengthening one another to overcome trials (as the eleven were about to face), and as Jesus loved us (kindness, concern, comforting, instructing, praying, vindicating, reproving, patiently and sacrificially). It is this kind of love that will “turn heads” so that people will realize that we are His disciples –because this kind of love is not found in the world.

Agape. The highest form of love–the willing sacrifice of self on behalf of God, neighbor, enemies and brethren. It is the love without which (in any of the four categories) one cannot be saved. May our loving God help us to be even as He is.


Gary Henson

1 Thayer, on kardia (heart), p. 325.
2 1 Cor. 10:31; Mat. 10:39.
3 Col. 3:1-2.
4 Col. 3:23; Rom. 12:1-2.
5 John 14:15.
6 Luke 10:29-37.
7 Eph. 4:25; Gal. 6:10; Mark 16:15.
8 Mat. 7:12.
9 1 John 3:16-19; Rom. 5:6.
10 Luke 23:34.
11 Acts 7:59-60.
12 Rom. 12:20-21.
13 1 John 4:19.
14 John 13:34-35.
15 1 Cor. 16:22; Luke 10:25-37;
Mat. 6:15; 1 John 2:9-11; 4:7-8.

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/agape/

May 16

What Is The Difference Between A Hypocrite And A Faithful Christian Who Stumbles At Least Once In A While?

The aim of this article is to pinpoint some of the basic difference between a thorough-going hypocrite and a faithful Christian who (although he realizes that he “stumbles” at least at times) strives with all of his heart to walk faithfully before God.
To correctly fight this battle, he must understand what it means to be (1) a hypocrite (one who pretends to be what he is not) and (2) a truly sincere, faithful Christian (a member of the Lord’s one—and only—true church—that is, one who strives with all of his heart to love God and, as a result, to do what God’s word (the Bible) teaches him to do.
It is possible for two people (for example, a husband and wife) to both learn and obey the truth (the Gospel of Christ), thus becoming Christians in so doing, and yet—with the passing of time—it is possible for either one or both of the two to fall away into unfaithfulness (by merely pretending to live as a Christian must). Consider the possibility that the wife remains faithful while the husband (without letting either his wife or any one else know about his apostasy) continues to be at every service of the church, even though it is the case that no longer does he give a serious thought to what is occurring all about him– especially does he not give serious attention to what is being said by the man who is preaching the sermon. Rather than listening with all his heart to the message, he thinks of worldly matters (such as envisioning himself being engaged in some sort of worldly (sinful) activity). A man who does such things may “fool” both his wife and many others in the assembly, but he cannot deceive God Almighty. However, he may be deceiving himself into believing that God-”-if indeed”, he says to himself, “there really is an infinite God and if the Bible really is His inspired word, then I shall be save from eternal punishment–after all, I am a religious person who attends almost all of the Sunday morning worship services. So, it is clear that I have nothing to fear, I know that God—if he exists—will not cast me into any lake of fire.” So, he sits calmly in his pew with a great deal of self-satisfaction.
At the same time, another couple (husband and wife) demonstrate (even though they are not absolutely perfect) even as they engage in singing, prayer, the Lord’s Supper, giving, or the preaching of God’s sacred word) that they not only put God ahead of everything else in their lives, but they realize that they need the mercy of God because they are not perfect—that is, it is not the case that they never sin at any time by (1) doing something which the Bible forbids or by (2) failing to do some deeds which the Bible makes clear is something which one must do to be pleasing to God.
The two couples described briefly just above can be the source of each and every one of us weighing our lives in the light of the sacred word of God, the Bible.
If any person is a hypocrite (merely pretends to be faithful), then if he/she is to be saved eternally, he/she must repent of their past sins and turn away from their wicked ways.
If any human being holds that he can deceive God into not knowing that he is living a hypocritical life, then—if he never subsequently repents (before his death)—he will be lost forever in the midst of very agonizing suffering.
Jesus made clear (Matt. 23:27-28) that every hypocrite is in very deep trouble. On the “outside” they are “beautiful” but on the “inside” they are full of mere bones and filth. Let us all help one another so that we will not be eternally punished.
It would be good for every person to thoroughly examine his own heart and deeds with the sincere intention of (1) not masking who he really is while he merely plays a part for those who observe him, (2) not acting with the desire–not to actually do what is right but merely to gain the approval of other mere human beings (see Matt. 6:1-3), (3) not being satisfied with external aspects of religion while he pays no attention to the crucial matters of love for God and his fellow human beings (Matt. 15:1-21), (4) not using the language of the Bible in such a fashion as to hide the real motives which are concealed in his heart (Matt. 22:18-22, and (5) not ignoring the marvelous teaching of Jesus by which He warns every hypocrite. May each and every one of us earnestly strive to reject all hypocritical thought and deeds.
Thomas B. Warren

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-hypocrite-and-a-faithful-christian-who-stumbles-at-least-once-in-a-while/

May 09

A MOTHER’S PRODUCTIVITY

It used to be that nobody could criticize motherhood, the flag or apple pie. Today some folks use the flag for kitchen curtains, Sara Lee makes the pie, and motherhood is delegated to the day care center. Productivity is the key idea. Women who have secular careers are thought to be productive, while one who makes a career of homemaking is made to feel inferior and unproductive.
A worthy mother is a treasure that is never forgotten. There were times I hated my mother: Funny though—I can’t remember why. I do however, remember that she rocked me. I remember that she read me “The Pokey Little Puppy.” I remember her going to school with me the first day—and crying at my wedding. Mom sacrificed for us. She hung out the sheets when the West Texas wind had frozen them stiff as boards, She got up with us in the night, worried when we were out too late. She cooked our breakfast and dragged us out of bed to eat it thanklessly. The pain of child-bearing doesn’t stop with labor, but the pain of a worthy mother has its reward:

Her children rise up and bless her,
Her husband also, and he praises her.
Charm is deceitful but a woman who fears the
Lord shall be praised.
Give her the product of her hands,
And let her works praise her….
Proverbs 31:28-31

A good mother deserves honor, whether the mother who bore you, or the mother who bore your children. You are the product of her labors. Let the product be a credit to her.
Jerry D. Lee

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/a-mothers-productivity/

May 02

Old Law, New Law, Both, or Neither?

When General Sam Houston defeated the Mexican General Santa Anna at the Battle of San Jacinto, the Texans were no longer under subjection to the laws of Mexico. Although, no doubt, copies of that law were still in their land, they were now to be under the new law of the Republic of Texas.
When Jesus defeated Satan by His death, burial, resurrection, ascension, coronation and establishment of His kingdom, no longer was any man to be in subjection to the law of Moses. Although copies of that law still exist, man is now under subjection to the new law of Christ.
Colossians 2:14 makes clear that the old law is no longer in effect. It states that Jesus blotted it out. In those days people would use a pointed tool to etch letters upon a heavily waxed board. If corrections were to be made, a spoon-shaped tool would rub out the letters. Such removal was “blotting out.” Thus, Jesus rubbed out the old law—it was removed. The verse also declares that Jesus took the old law “out of the way.” Thus, it is no longer an obstacle on man’s pathway—it is gone. Furthermore, the verse reveals that Jesus nailed the old law to the cross. Thus, just as Jesus died upon the cross, so did the old law. It was dead–ineffective. No, the old law is no longer in effect, and we do not obtain our religious laws nor authority from it.
Galatians 3:19 also teaches that the old testament law has ended. It states that the old covenant was to be in effect “till the seed should come.” Thus, when the seed came, the law ended. Who was that seed? That seed was Christ (v.16). And Christ has come.
Yes, the old law has been taken out of the way. However, some people have erroneously concluded that such verses teach that ALL religious law has been taken away. Thus, they claim, we are under grace, not law. They then proceed to do in religion whatever they want—after all, there’s no law. Yet, and quite contrary, the Bible teaches that we ARE under a law–the law of Christ. Notice these revealing phrases: “…fulfill the law of Christ” (Gal. 6:2); “…under the law to Christ” (1 Cor. 9:21); “…the perfect law of liberty” (Jas. 1:25); “… the law of the Spirit of life in Christ” (Rom. 8:2). Yes, the old law has been taken out of the way, and the new law is now in effect.
Someone might ask, “If this is so, then why do we still have the Old Testament in our Bibles?” The answer is found in 1 Corinthians 10:1-11 (see also: Rom. 15:4; Jude 5).
So, which law are we under today?–old law, new law, neither or both? Today, you and I are amenable and only amenable to the law of Christ–the New Testament.
Gary Henson

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/old-law-new-law-both-or-neither/

Apr 25

TO APPLAUD OR NOT TO APPLAUD IN WORSHIP

To “profane” something is to take that which is holy and treat it as common. This is the reason I don’t applaud in worship unto God.
Worship to the Almighty, Eternal, Sovereign God is unique, in a class by itself. (1) Only in the Lord’s Supper do we eat a meal that is not designed to satisfy physical hunger. It was eaten purely as a memorial, after the disciples had already eaten the passover feast. Meals eaten at holidays in our time are feasts designed to satisfy our physical hunger. (2) In worship we pray to God. It is a solemn and serious occasion. But we do not pray to Elvis to celebrate his birthday. (3) In giving, we are to do so cheerfully, not grudgingly, as God has prospered us. The I.R.S. does not require this attitude when we pay our taxes. Also, the Lord does not specify in dollars and cents, but the I.R.S. does. (4) In singing to God we are to “make melody in the heart” (Col. 3:16). This is not required when singing at a secular event. (5) In preaching, we must preach only the truth. But in social and political speeches there is no such requirement. One can even make inflammatory speeches against the government.
If clapping is a scriptural form of worship, couldn’t the Lord have thought of it?

ARGUMENTS FOR CLAPPING IN WORSHIP

  1. “If we would clap to celebrate a ball game, how much more does Jesus deserve our applause?” Reply: this is not the way scriptural authority is established. That can only be established from Scripture. If we can eat popcorn to celebrate a ball game, how much more should we eat popcorn in worship to God? (Don’t blame me for the absurdity of any of these arguments. I am only showing what else it “proves” if the arguments are valid.) If we can eat black-eyed peas and hog jowl to celebrate New Year’s Day, how much more should we eat these in worship to God? (I hesitate to make these arguments since some already have coffee and donuts in Bible classes. So far, they haven’t gone “whole hog” and said we can have these in the worship assembly.) If we would pull pranks to celebrate April Fool’s Day, how much more should we pull pranks in worship unto God? If we shoot fireworks to celebrate Independence Day, how much more should we shoot fireworks to celebrate our independence from sin and the Law of Moses? If we play “Pin The Tale On The Donkey” to celebrate our children’s birthdays, how much more should we do so to celebrate our Lord’s birth? If we take the day off from work to celebrate Labor Day, how much more should we take the Lord’s Day off to celebrate that we are laborers in the vineyard of the Lord?
    Had enough? How about one more. If we wear false faces to celebrate Halloween, how much more should we wear false faces in worship? All of these are consequence of not basing an argument on Scripture but on human reasoning from secular events.
  2. “Applause means the same as saying ‘Amen.’” Reply: According to what standard of authority? It never meant that in the Bible. When a curse was pronounced by the priest upon an adulteress she was to respond by saying “Amen, Amen” (Num. 5:11-31). If clapping is another way of saying “Amen” it is difficult to imagine the woman applauding when a curse was pronounced upon her.
    Moses pronounced twelve curses on the tribes of Reuben, Gad, Asher, Zebulun, Dan, and Naphtali. After each curse Israel was to respond “Amen” (Deut. 27:15-26). Could they have substituted a round of applause and been acceptable to God? Would it be acceptable for us to close our prayers with a round of applause instead of an audible “Amen” (1 Cor. 14:16)? Most of the epistles end with an “Amen.” How do you communicate hand clapping in writing? This shows that something is being communicated in writing that there is no equivalent for. There is no record where “Amen” was used in a secular way. It is a word which belongs to the spiritual realm. Clapping belongs in the secular realm and is associated with sports and entertainment. There is a good reason for this since clapping is never mentioned in the New Testament.
    Webster’s definition of applause includes cheering and stomping the feet. Those who defend clapping must of necessity depend these also.
  3. “If we can change the holy kiss to a handshake (Rom. 16:16), then we can change ‘Amen’ to applause.” Reply: The Bible does not command the kiss as a form of greeting. Paul was not instituting kissing as the proper way to greet. The custom of kissing was a form of greeting or endorsement and had been practiced for thousands of years (Exod. 18:7; 1 Sam. 10:1; etc.), so Paul was not beginning a new practice. He was regulating the attitude with which this custom was practiced. It was not a command to kiss. The emphasis was on the kind of kiss. It was not be a hypocritical kiss, like that of Judas (Mk. 14:44) or of Joab (2 Sam. 20:9). Nor was it to be a lascivious kiss (Gal. 5:19-21), but a holy one. Whatever form of greeting is the custom at a particular time and place, it should be pure.

BOOING AND HISSING?
If one may applaud a sermon to show approval (as one may show approval in this manner at a ball game), then why could not one equally boo or hiss to show disapproval if he disagrees? In a matter of time our services would be filled with applause (including stomping the feet), wolf whistles, cat calls, boos, and hisses. The right for one is the right for the others. If the silence of the New Testament authorizes applause then it also authorizes boos, hisses, jeers, etc. Is this really what we want? Has worship become so casual to us that there is no difference in our behavior and degree of solemnity at worship or at an entertainment event?
Perhaps unwittingly, brethren have bought into the idea advanced in debate by some defenders of instrumental music in worship, that “worship is a right thing to do and there is no wrong way to do it” (Given O. Blakely, Blakely-Highers Debate). Since the Scriptures are silent about applause, and nothing is said to indicate that clapping is an acceptable substitute for saying “Amen,” and since it is also silent about booing, hissing, etc., we believe we have concluded rightly that God does not approve either practice in worship or in a religious context.
Dick Blackford

Permanent link to this article: https://okcsbs.com/to-applaud-or-not-to-applaud-in-worship/

Older posts «

» Newer posts